The Political Scene | The New Yorker

How to Protect the 2026 Elections from Donald Trump

37 snips
Feb 7, 2026
Richard Hasen, director of UCLA’s Safeguarding Democracy Project and law professor, breaks down legal limits and risks to U.S. elections. He explains threats around seizing ballots and nationalizing contests. Short sentences cover voter-data dangers, court injunctions to block interference, and how local civic action can shore up the vote.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Who Actually Runs U.S. Elections

  • The Constitution leaves states in charge of running elections, with Congress having narrow override power under Article I, Section 4.
  • Richard L. Hasen emphasizes the president has no unilateral authority to 'nationalize' elections or control tabulation.
INSIGHT

Voter Rolls As A Pretext

  • Requesting voter-roll data can be a pretext to push for stringent documentary-proof voting laws.
  • Hasen warns such moves aim to disenfranchise voters and provide a cover to claim systemic fraud.
INSIGHT

The Real Threat Is Post-Vote Interference

  • The riskiest interference is on the 'back end' after votes are cast, during counting and chain-of-custody.
  • Seizing ballots or breaking custody would fatally undermine confidence in results even without large-scale fraud.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app