This Is Why Why the Mandelson files mean more trouble for Keir Starmer
Mar 11, 2026
Rob Powell, Sky News political correspondent who digs into documents and due diligence, walks through the newly released Mandelson files. Short sentences cover what was published, withheld and why. He outlines due diligence on Jeffrey Epstein links, appointment vetting, the severance payment and which documents could still change the story.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Why The First Mandelson Files Were Released
- The government released an initial tranche of documents about Peter Mandelson's US ambassadorship because of a Humble Address pushed by Conservatives.
- This first batch covers appointment offer, due diligence, official appointment papers, dismissal and severance but is only a minority of material promised.
The Most Damaging Material Is Still Withheld
- The key missing items are WhatsApp messages and specific questions Number 10 asked Mandelson about Jeffrey Epstein after the due diligence report.
- Those withheld materials, plus records of meetings and private assurances, are likely to be more revealing and politically damaging.
Due Diligence Already Flagged Epstein Ties
- The due diligence compiled public reporting including a 2019 JP Morgan-commissioned report linking Mandelson closely to Jeffrey Epstein.
- That showed officials were aware his relationship with Epstein continued after Epstein's first conviction before appointment.