
Good Life Project You Probably Shouldn’t Say That. And Yet…(Groundbreaking Science of Disagreeing Well) | Julia Minson
May 4, 2026
Julia Minson, behavioral scientist and Harvard Kennedy School professor who studies disagreement, shares science-backed ways to stay connected across differences. She explains why arguments escalate, the HEAR framework for speaking without triggering defensiveness, why facts can backfire, and how practicing low-stakes drills and curious behaviors builds better conversations.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Disagreement Is More Visible Post Pandemic
- People now know more about where others stand on issues because personal identity is visible, which increases awareness of disagreement.
- Julia Minson explains post-pandemic norms (Zoom backgrounds, revealed votes) make differences more visible and force choices about engaging.
Argument Arises When Winning Becomes The Goal
- Many disagreements escalate because participants treat them like arguments where the goal is persuasion and winning.
- Minson contrasts low-stakes disagreements (accepting different beliefs) with interdependent contexts (parenting, work) that force reconciliation.
Ask Curious Questions When You Disagree Up The Chain
- If you disagree with a boss, express genuine curiosity and ask them to explain their reasoning instead of bluntly contradicting them.
- Minson recommends naming risks you see and inviting the manager to share their thinking to create receptivity.




