The Intersection of Political Science and Practical Politics with Matt Grossman

Derived from his dissertation, The Not-So Interests investigates the relationship between societal groups and organized interest representation in U.S. politics. Grossmann examines which occupational, racial, and professional groups form interest organizations and which of those organizations attain influence in policymaking. The book analyzes the mechanisms that grant certain groups the authority to speak for broader constituencies and how that shapes policy debates. Using empirical data and case studies, Grossmann shows disparities in representation and the consequences for democratic responsiveness. The work contributes to debates on pluralism, inequality, and the distribution of political voice.

Artists of the Possible traces the history of policymaking in the United States from 1945 onward, emphasizing how practical constraints and political negotiation shaped reforms. Grossmann examines the role of political entrepreneurs and institutional dynamics in producing incremental, feasible policy changes. The book combines historical narrative with political science analysis to explain why sweeping transformations are rare and how compromise drives governance. It highlights episodes of significant policy innovation alongside periods of stagnation to show patterns in American political development. The work provides context for contemporary debates about the limits and possibilities of governmental action.

In 'How Social Science Got Better', Matt Grossmann argues that social science is undergoing a renaissance, becoming more relevant, rigorous, and self-reflective. He emphasizes how scholars now better analyze biases and incorporate diverse perspectives, leading to significant progress in the field. The book provides a comprehensive overview of recent trends and improvements in social science research.

This book provides a fresh and comprehensive investigation into the differences between the Republican and Democratic parties. It explains how the Republican Party is driven by an ideological movement, with leaders prioritizing conservatism and broad values, while the Democratic Party is a coalition of social groups, with leaders seeking concrete government action to appeal to various group identities and interests. The book reveals how these differences affect how Democrats and Republicans think about politics, rely on distinct sources of information, argue past one another, and pursue divergent goals in government. It offers a rigorous new understanding of contemporary polarization and governing dysfunction in American politics.