The Gray Area with Sean Illing What should Democrats do about the Supreme Court?
Three Pillars of Democracy
- True democracy requires more than just political processes; it needs economic fairness and social solidarity.
- Economic inequality and social fracturing threaten the stability and inclusivity of a democratic system.
Economic vs. Luck Egalitarianism
- Economic democracy emphasizes relational equality and sufficiency, enabling everyone to participate fully in society.
- This contrasts with luck egalitarianism, which focuses on compensating for the misfortunes of luck.
The Myth of Rapacious Redistribution
- Conservatives often argue that democracy leads to the have-nots exploiting the haves through redistribution.
- However, research shows the less someone has, the less likely they are to politically participate.
If Democrats win back power this November, they will be faced with a choice: Leave the existing Supreme Court intact, and watch their legislative agenda — and perhaps democracy itself — be gradually gutted by 5-4 and 6-3 judicial rulings; or use their power to reform the nation’s highest court over fierce opposition by the Republican party.
Ganesh Sitaraman is a former senior advisor to Elizabeth Warren and a law professor at Vanderbilt. He’s also the author of one of the most hotly debated proposals for Supreme Court reform, as well as the fairest and clearest analyst I’ve read regarding the benefits and drawbacks of every other plausible proposal for Supreme Court reform. So in this conversation, we discuss the range of options, from well-known ideas like court packing and term limits to more obscure proposals like the 5-5-5 balanced bench and a judicial lottery system.
But there’s another reason I wanted Sitaraman on the show right now. Supreme Court reform matters — for good or for ill — because democracy matters. In his recent book, The Great Democracy, Sitaraman makes an argument that's come to sit at the core of my thinking, too: The fundamental fight in American politics right now is about whether we will become a true democracy. And not just a democracy in the thin, political definition we normally use — holding elections, and ensuring access to the franchise. The fight is for a thicker form of a democracy, one that takes economic power seriously, that makes the construction of a certain kind of civic and political culture central to its aims.
So this is a conversation about what that kind of democracy would look like, and what it would take to get there – up to and including Supreme Court reform.
References:
Jump-Starting America by Jonathan Gruber and Simon Johnson
"How to save the Supreme Court" by Daniel Epps and Ganesh Sitaraman
Sitaraman's tweet threads about expanding the court , term limits , the 5-5-5 Balanced bench, lottery approach, supermajority voting requirements, jurisdiction stripping, legislative overrides, and what the best approach is.
Book recommendations:
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn
The Public and Its Problems by John Dewey
The Anarchy by William Dalrymple
Credits:
Producer/Audio wizard - Jeff Geld
Researcher - Roge Karma
Please consider making a contribution to Vox to support this show: bit.ly/givepodcasts Your support will help us keep having ambitious conversations about big ideas.
New to the show? Want to check out Ezra’s favorite episodes? Check out the Ezra Klein Show beginner’s guide (http://bit.ly/EKSbeginhere)
Want to contact the show? Reach out at ezrakleinshow@vox.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices