
The Grumpy Strategists Mindboggling! celebrating $30 billion on sub sheds (not actual subs), while leaders outdo One Nation's darker instincts
9 snips
Feb 19, 2026 They boggle at a $30 billion plan to build submarine construction sheds and who actually benefits. They debate whether the project is deterrence or jobs theatre and question the 15-year timeline. They unpack workforce shortfalls and the likely need for skilled migrants. They also discuss rising anti-immigrant rhetoric around repatriation and the irony of relying on migrants for health and construction.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Big Spend Before Any Submarines
- Michael Shoebridge and Marcus Hellyer argue the $30 billion submarine yard spend precedes any submarines and mainly benefits South Australia via jobs.
- They question the national security logic and warn this large upfront cost delays actual capability for years.
Area Breakdown Reveals Schedule Mismatch
- The $30 billion is split into Areas 1–3: fabrication, outfitting and a nuclear area, with a lengthy timetable to 2040.
- Marcus and Michael highlight the schedule mismatch between facility completion and promised submarine construction.
Eiffel Tower And Bridges For Steel
- Marcus jokes about sourcing steel from the Eiffel Tower, Golden Gate and Sydney Harbour Bridge to meet steel needs quickly.
- Michael quips that removing the Harbour Bridge would 'restore social cohesion' and free material for the sheds.
