FiveThirtyEight Politics How The Polls Did In 2024
14 snips
Nov 21, 2024 
In this conversation, Ruth Agelnik, polling editor at the New York Times, and Elliot Morris, director of Data Analytics, dissect the 2024 election polling landscape. They reveal how polls improved accuracy with only a 2.7 percentage point miss this year, contrasting with previous elections. They tackle challenges like underestimating Trump's support and the evolving methodologies in polling. The duo also discusses innovative techniques such as river sampling and the impact of demographic shifts on voter behavior.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Recurring Trump Underestimation
- Polls performed relatively well in 2024, but they consistently underestimated Trump's support for the third consecutive election.
- This consistent underestimation suggests a recurring issue specific to Trump's presence on the ballot.
Unclear Polling Misses
- The reasons for polling misses in 2016 and 2020 remain unclear, but the 2024 results offer some clues.
- Merging polling data with voter turnout data might reveal non-response patterns among Trump supporters.
Polling Methods Comparison
- Ruth Agelnik highlights Elliot Morris' analysis of different polling methods.
- Morris found that newer methods like river sampling performed better than traditional live phone polls.