The MeidasTouch Podcast Oops! Melania Makes Fatal Error in Court over Epstein Claims
10 snips
Jan 18, 2026 Melania Trump may have blundered in court over defamation claims related to Epstein, raising concerns about potentially damaging discoveries. Michael Wolff's anti-SLAPP strategy seeks to challenge her attempts to silence press coverage. Questions about her past and residency could lead to tense revelations. If Wolff can demonstrate her ties to New York, it could have major legal repercussions. Plus, a scathing review of Melania's recent AI press conference performance adds a layer of intrigue to her legal troubles.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Threats Spark A Strategic Lawsuit
- Ben Meiselas argues Melania threatened journalists over alleged Epstein links and declined to sue Michael Wolff despite threatening him.
- Wolff countered by suing under New York anti-SLAPP law to get discovery and force answers about her connections.
Removal To Federal Court As Delay Tactic
- Melania removed Wolff's state suit to federal court claiming Florida residence and diversity jurisdiction.
- Ben explains this two-step move aims to delay discovery and possibly shift the case to Judge Eileen Cannon in Florida.
Demand Jurisdictional Discovery Immediately
- Wolff asks for jurisdictional discovery to prove Melania actually lives in New York and oppose the federal removal.
- He warns that refusing discovery could create an adverse inference against her and force remand to New York state court.
