
The Vergecast The lawyer who won against Apple at the Supreme Court
May 14, 2019
Mark Rifkin, managing partner at Wolf Haldenstein, played a crucial role in the landmark Apple versus Pepper case. He shares insights on the Supreme Court's ruling that allows consumers to challenge Apple's App Store practices, emphasizing its potential to reshape antitrust law. The discussion highlights the implications for consumer rights, as well as how this case might influence other tech giants and their market behaviors. Rifkin also delves into the evolving landscape of antitrust challenges facing the tech industry.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Monopoly of Distribution
- Apple controls app distribution on iPhones, unlike Android's open approach.
- The lawsuit seeks an injunction against this monopolization.
Apple's Justification
- Apple justifies its App Store control by citing security and consumer choice.
- Rifkin plans to challenge these justifications in court.
Relevant Market
- Apple's market share argument is irrelevant.
- They have a 100% share among iPhone owners, which is the relevant market.

