Rustom Moopen is a general dentist with a keen focus on digital dentistry, particularly in 3D printing and milling. He dives into the pros and cons of investing in these technologies, discussing their durability, cost-effectiveness, and long-term ROI. The conversation highlights how milling and printing serve different purposes, with insights on workflow improvements, patient satisfaction, and the importance of mentorship in mastering these methods. Moopen also emphasizes the evolving landscape of dental practices with technology, reshaping how dentists approach patient care.
01:10:26
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
Milled Composite Durability Advantage
Milled composites enjoy a proven track record of superior durability compared to printed composites.
Printed composites can degrade over time, while milled blocks are highly polymerized and stable.
volunteer_activism ADVICE
Choose Milling for Durable Splints
Printed splints often break within a year; milled splints are more durable and reliable.
Milling splints requires a five-axis mill but offers better fit and longevity than printed or acrylic splints.
volunteer_activism ADVICE
Match Workflow with Milling Choices
Decide if you want to design and mill yourself or outsource to a lab to fit your workflow and budget.
Outsourcing costs more money but saves time; doing in-house saves fees but requires dedicated effort.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Should You Invest in Chairside Milling or 3D Printing?
How do milling and printing compare in durability and cost?
Which option provides the best long-term ROI for your workflow?
In this deep dive, Dr. Rustom Moopen shares his experience with CEREC, ExoCAD, and in-house fabrication, breaking down the real benefits and limitations of both technologies.
From restoration strength to efficiency and investment costs, this episode unpacks what every dentist needs to know before taking the leap into milling, printing, and CAD/CAM workflows.
Protrusive Dental Pearl: Achieving the same effect (of the ‘Soft Clamp’ by Kerr) with a metal clamp without requiring a potentially painful palatal injection – Dr. Jo Cape (Protruserati) suggests using a cotton bud to apply topical anesthetic to the gingiva where the clamp will be placed, leaving it for a minute, improving patient comfort!
This episode aimed to provide an in-depth understanding of the fundamentals of 3D printing, milling, and digital dentistry, enabling clinicians to integrate these technologies efficiently into their workflow for improved precision, cost-effectiveness, and patient outcomes.
Dentists will be able to –
1. Differentiate between 3D printing and milling, understanding their respective strengths, limitations, and applications in dentistry.
2. Recognize the financial implications, including initial costs, long-term savings, and return on investment when incorporating digital fabrication.
3. Understand the workflow of chairside milling, including preparation, scanning, design, fabrication, and finishing of restorations.