#67 – David Chalmers on the nature and ethics of consciousness

Dec 16, 2019

Guest

David Chalmers

Guest

Arden Koehler

David Chalmers, a leading philosopher on consciousness, and Arden Koehler, an ethics PhD student, explore the nature of conscious experience. Chalmers introduces the mind-bending concept of 'philosophical zombies' to question moral status. They discuss the trolley problem involving conscious humans and non-conscious zombies, sparking a debate over what qualifies beings for moral consideration. The duo also dives into the ethics of AI consciousness and the implications of virtual reality, challenging listeners to rethink reality, ethics, and our responsibilities towards all forms of consciousness.

Ask episode

AI Snips

Chapters

Books

Transcript

Episode notes

INSIGHT

Mary's Room and Subjective Experience

Jackson's Mary thought experiment highlights the gap between objective knowledge and subjective experience.
Chalmers uses it to illustrate the "what it's like" aspect of conscious experience, regardless of materialism debates.

INSIGHT

Non-Reductionist Views

Chalmers explores non-reductionist views like dualism (mind and body as distinct) and panpsychism (consciousness in all matter).
He acknowledges challenges like dualism's interaction problem and panpsychism's combination problem.

INSIGHT

Integrated Information Theory

Integrated Information Theory (IIT) mathematically links consciousness to information integration (phi).
Chalmers finds IIT promising but early-stage; he suggests refining phi to address issues like matrix multipliers' high phi.

Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode

Get the app

What is it like to be you right now? You're seeing this text on the screen, smelling the coffee next to you, and feeling the warmth of the cup. There’s a lot going on in your head — your conscious experience.

Now imagine beings that are identical to humans, but for one thing: they lack this conscious experience. If you spill your coffee on them, they’ll jump like anyone else, but inside they'll feel no pain and have no thoughts: the lights are off.

The concept of these so-called 'philosophical zombies' was popularised by today’s guest — celebrated philosophy professor David Chalmers — in order to explore the nature of consciousness. In a forthcoming book he poses a classic 'trolley problem':

"Suppose you have a conscious human on one train track, and five non-conscious humanoid zombies on another. If you do nothing, a trolley will hit and kill the conscious human. If you flip a switch to redirect the trolley, you can save the conscious human, but in so doing kill the five non-conscious humanoid zombies. What should you do?"

Many people think you should divert the trolley, precisely because the lack of conscious experience means the moral status of the zombies is much reduced or absent entirely.

So, which features of consciousness qualify someone for moral consideration? One view is that the only conscious states that matter are those that have a positive or negative quality, like pleasure and suffering. But Dave’s intuitions are quite different.

• Links to learn more, summary and full transcript.
• Advice on how to read our advice.
• Anonymous answers on: bad habits, risk and failure.

Instead of zombies he asks us to consider 'Vulcans', who can see and hear and reflect on the world around them, but are incapable of experiencing pleasure or pain.

Now imagine a further trolley problem: suppose you have a normal human on one track, and five Vulcans on the other. Should you divert the trolley to kill the five Vulcans in order to save the human?

Dave firmly believes the answer is no, and if he's right, pleasure and suffering can’t be the only things required for moral status. The fact that Vulcans are conscious in other ways must matter in itself.

Dave is one of the world's top experts on the philosophy of consciousness. He helped return the question 'what is consciousness?' to the centre stage of philosophy with his 1996 book 'The Conscious Mind', which argued against then-dominant materialist theories of consciousness.

This comprehensive interview, at over four hours long, outlines each contemporary theory of consciousness, what they have going for them, and their likely ethical implications. Those theories span the full range from illusionism, the idea that consciousness is in some sense an 'illusion', to panpsychism, according to which it's a fundamental physical property present in all matter.

These questions are absolutely central for anyone who wants to build a positive future. If insects were conscious our treatment of them could already be an atrocity. If computer simulations of people will one day be conscious, how will we know, and how should we treat them? And what is it about consciousness that matters, if anything?

Dave Chalmers is probably the best person on the planet to ask these questions, and Rob & Arden cover this and much more over the course of what is both our longest ever episode, and our personal favourite so far.

Chapters:

Rob's intro (00:00:00)
The interview begins (00:02:11)
Philosopher’s survey (00:06:37)
Free will (00:13:37)
Survey correlations (00:20:06)
Progress in philosophy (00:35:01)
Simulations (00:51:30)
The problem of consciousness (01:13:01)
Dualism and panpsychism (01:26:52)
Is consciousness an illusion? (01:34:52)
Idealism (01:43:13)
Integrated information theory (01:51:08)
Moral status and consciousness (02:06:10)
Higher order views of consciousness (02:11:46)
The views of philosophers on eating meat (02:20:23)
Artificial consciousness (02:34:25)
The zombie and vulcan trolley problems (02:38:43)
Illusionism and moral status (02:56:12)
Panpsychism and moral status (03:06:19)
Mind uploading (03:15:58)
Personal identity (03:22:51)
Virtual reality and the experience machine (03:28:56)
Singularity (03:42:44)
AI alignment (04:07:39)
Careers in academia (04:23:37)
Having fun disagreements (04:32:54)
Rob’s outro (04:42:14)

Producer: Keiran Harris.