
The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast Ep. 373: Michael Walzer on Just Wars (Part Two)
12 snips
Aug 18, 2025 Dive into the moral maze of just and unjust wars with Michael Walzer's insights. Discover when it might be acceptable to strike first or intervene in another country's affairs. The discussion navigates historical examples like the American Civil War and the Six-Day War, emphasizing the complexities of military justification. Explore the balance between state sovereignty and individual rights during humanitarian crises, and learn how historical context shapes perceptions of intervention. It's a thought-provoking examination of ethics in warfare!
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Intent, Not Power, Matters
- Threat must be anchored to manifest intent, not vague power shifts or ambition.
- Walzer seeks signs that make hostile intent morally actionable, not mere speculation.
Three Criteria For Anticipation
- Walzer's three criteria for anticipatory force are manifest intent, active preparation, and waiting greatly magnifies risk.
- He frames this as acting in the 'present' to preserve choice under clear danger.
Six-Day War Case Study
- The Six-Day War is argued as a justified anticipatory strike given blockades, troop massing, and alliance formations.
- Walzer treats Israel's preemptive attack as defensible under his three criteria.









