The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Ep. 373: Michael Walzer on Just Wars (Part Two)

12 snips
Aug 18, 2025
Dive into the moral maze of just and unjust wars with Michael Walzer's insights. Discover when it might be acceptable to strike first or intervene in another country's affairs. The discussion navigates historical examples like the American Civil War and the Six-Day War, emphasizing the complexities of military justification. Explore the balance between state sovereignty and individual rights during humanitarian crises, and learn how historical context shapes perceptions of intervention. It's a thought-provoking examination of ethics in warfare!
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Intent, Not Power, Matters

  • Threat must be anchored to manifest intent, not vague power shifts or ambition.
  • Walzer seeks signs that make hostile intent morally actionable, not mere speculation.
INSIGHT

Three Criteria For Anticipation

  • Walzer's three criteria for anticipatory force are manifest intent, active preparation, and waiting greatly magnifies risk.
  • He frames this as acting in the 'present' to preserve choice under clear danger.
ANECDOTE

Six-Day War Case Study

  • The Six-Day War is argued as a justified anticipatory strike given blockades, troop massing, and alliance formations.
  • Walzer treats Israel's preemptive attack as defensible under his three criteria.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app