The Playbook Podcast The skeptics speak
Mar 18, 2026
Discussion of two prominent war skeptics taking public stages and how their remarks could shape Iran debate. A look at Illinois primaries, AIPAC influence, and political spending tactics. Analysis of intelligence testimony to watch and the implications for national security oversight. Examination of a DHS confirmation amid department turmoil.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
War Skeptics Now Speaking For The Administration
- Two prominent former anti-war figures in Trump's orbit, Tulsi Gabbard and J.D. Vance, are speaking publicly amid the Iran war, forcing them to reconcile past skepticism with current administration policy.
- Their appearances (Gabbard at the Senate Intelligence Committee; Vance at a Michigan midterms-style rally) spotlight how they each manage loyalty to Trump while avoiding endorsing the war explicitly.
Gabbard's Silence Meets A Resignation Spotlight
- Tulsi Gabbard has stayed largely silent since joining the administration and posted a noncommittal statement on X after a senior aide's resignation.
- Her hearing is high-stakes because Joe Kent quit over opposition to the Iran war, and senators will press Gabbard on past anti-war statements.
Committee Hearing Could Reveal Operational Threads
- Testimony from intelligence officials can reveal operational details despite classified limits; John Ratcliffe and Kash Patel joining Gabbard at the hearing could shed light on decision-making.
- Ratcliffe has been in the small inner group shaping these choices, while Patel faces scrutiny over personnel cuts tied to Iranian expertise.