
In Our Time Philippa Foot
19 snips
Jun 13, 2024 Anil Gomes, a Fellow in Philosophy at Trinity College, and Sophie Grace Chappell, a Professor at the Open University, dive into the life and legacy of Philippa Foot, a trailblazer in virtue ethics. They discuss her pivotal question, 'Why be moral?' and how she challenged the subjectivity of morals, particularly in light of historical atrocities. The conversation touches on her influential concepts, such as the Trolley Problem, and the vital role virtues play in human flourishing. Their insights unveil the intricate dance between ethics, personal experience, and philosophical inquiry.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Facts vs. Values
- The dominant ethical theory during Philippa Foot's time distinguished between objective facts and subjective values.
- This meant moral judgments, like "Nazis are bad," couldn't be objectively right or wrong.
Rudeness Example
- Philippa Foot challenged the fact-value distinction using the example of rudeness.
- Rudeness is an evaluation but depends on facts, suggesting values and facts are intertwined.
Challenging the Dichotomy
- Philippa Foot, Iris Murdoch, Mary Midgley, and Elizabeth Anscombe challenged the fact-value dichotomy.
- They explored how values are embedded even in seemingly factual statements.





