Legal AF by MeidasTouch Trump Runs Scared as Judge Obliterates His Games
Jan 30, 2026
Lee Gelernt, ACLU attorney who litigates high-profile immigration and civil rights cases, breaks down the Tren de Aragua controversy. He discusses court fights over due process for 137 men, allegations about transfers to El Salvador and Venezuela, the judge pushing for contempt, and the administration's disputed evidence and legal maneuvers.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Weak Evidence Did Not Justify Mass Removals
- The Trump administration relied on flimsy cultural indicators to label migrants as Tren de Aragua members.
- The court required the government to provide a concrete plan to give the 137 detainees habeas hearings after they were removed without due process.
Transfers Aimed To Evade Judicial Oversight
- The 137 men were sent to El Salvador and then transferred to Venezuela to evade U.S. court jurisdiction.
- Chief Judge Boesberg ordered the government to propose how it will restore due process to those removed persons.
Submit Practical Due-Process Options
- Provide a concrete, court-friendly plan for restoring habeas rights to displaced detainees.
- Consider remote hearings, consular processing, or returning individuals on flights to satisfy due process quickly.