The Vault: The Epstein Files

Epstein Files Unsealed: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 12) (3/10/26)

Mar 11, 2026
Paul Cassell, former federal judge and survivor advocate, gives sworn deposition testimony about challenging Epstein’s 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement and public statements involving Alan Dershowitz. He explains naming high-profile figures, distinguishing speculation from evidence, media briefings, and how survivor allegations were evaluated and disclosed. The conversation focuses on legal strategy, discovery disputes, and ethics in victim-centered advocacy.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Privilege Claims Explain Missing Prince Andrew Documents

  • Paul Cassell pursued claims about Prince Andrew despite the government's production gap because he believed privilege assertions, not absence of information, explained missing documents.
  • He pointed to thousands of pages with asserted privileges and said absence of a signed Prince Andrew letter didn't mean no influence occurred.
INSIGHT

Power Uses Surrogates Not Direct Contact

  • Cassell described realistic channels of influence for powerful figures as indirect, using surrogates and top lawyers rather than direct contact.
  • He explained that someone influential would recruit well‑connected defense lawyers and political allies to shape a favorable deal.
ANECDOTE

Email to Nightline Identified Client Allegations

  • Cassell recounted emailing ABC's Nightline that he represents a young woman who alleged sexual abuse by Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz.
  • He emphasized he was speaking as the attorney for someone who had made those allegations, not inventing claims himself.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app