
The Vault: The Epstein Files Epstein Files Unsealed: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 12) (3/10/26)
Mar 11, 2026
Paul Cassell, former federal judge and survivor advocate, gives sworn deposition testimony about challenging Epstein’s 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement and public statements involving Alan Dershowitz. He explains naming high-profile figures, distinguishing speculation from evidence, media briefings, and how survivor allegations were evaluated and disclosed. The conversation focuses on legal strategy, discovery disputes, and ethics in victim-centered advocacy.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Privilege Claims Explain Missing Prince Andrew Documents
- Paul Cassell pursued claims about Prince Andrew despite the government's production gap because he believed privilege assertions, not absence of information, explained missing documents.
- He pointed to thousands of pages with asserted privileges and said absence of a signed Prince Andrew letter didn't mean no influence occurred.
Power Uses Surrogates Not Direct Contact
- Cassell described realistic channels of influence for powerful figures as indirect, using surrogates and top lawyers rather than direct contact.
- He explained that someone influential would recruit well‑connected defense lawyers and political allies to shape a favorable deal.
Email to Nightline Identified Client Allegations
- Cassell recounted emailing ABC's Nightline that he represents a young woman who alleged sexual abuse by Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz.
- He emphasized he was speaking as the attorney for someone who had made those allegations, not inventing claims himself.
