Unbelievable?

Free Will And Responsibility | Amna Whiston v Matthew Su hosted by Sam McKee

6 snips
Feb 19, 2026
Amna Whiston, Oxford philosopher of mind who defends libertarian free will, and Matthew Su, Cambridge PhD researcher arguing a compatibilist-style account, spar over whether we truly author our choices. They spar about determinism versus alternative possibilities, courtroom and legal examples, science and levels of explanation, AI and philosophical zombies, personhood, temptation, mental health, and whether social conditions or laws enhance or restrict agency.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Limitations Of Brain-Timing Studies

  • Libet-style brain experiments target trivial actions and mislevel the debate.
  • Matthew insists free will is diachronic, evaluative, and fits higher-level explanations.
INSIGHT

Why You're Not A Zombie

  • Introspection gives immediate reason to deny we are philosophical zombies.
  • Amna treats AI and robots as extensions of human agency, not persons yet.
ANECDOTE

Is Your Cat Free?

  • Sam asked whether a cat shares human-style freedom.
  • Matthew replied cats are not rational agents but are "free as a cat" at the biological level.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app