
The Hidden Curriculum E24 - How does an academic journal work? with Catherine Maclean
Jul 6, 2021
Catherine Maclean, an Associate Professor of Economics at Temple University and co-editor at JPAM, dives into the intriguing mechanics of academic journals. She clears the fog around the publishing process, shedding light on the roles of editors and the complexities of peer reviews. Topics include navigating the application process, the importance of aligning manuscripts with journal objectives, and strategies for effective feedback. Maclean also discusses managing research amidst personal commitments, including her life with five dogs!
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Editors Can Spend Hours On One Paper
- Catherine prioritized JPAM handling and often reads new manuscripts immediately or the next day.
- She sometimes spends hours re-reading a difficult paper before making a decision.
Actionable Referee Comments Determine Fate
- Editors look for action items in referee reports to judge whether a paper is salvageable.
- Clear, specific critiques (e.g., bad pre-trends, missing robustness checks) matter more than vague complaints.
Tell The Editor The Bottom Line
- In your private letter to the editor, synthesize your recommendation and key reasons.
- Tell the editor clearly if you recommend accept, revise, or reject and list the main supporting points.

