Climate Change on Trial Ep. 12 | Mann at War
4 snips
Feb 6, 2024 In this explosive episode, the DC defamation trial of Mark Stein continues with devastating developments for Michael Mann. The judge criticizes Mann's case as disjointed and questions the purpose of witnesses. Dr. Judith Curry describes the devastation of her professional life due to Mann's smearing. Evidence suggests a whitewash of Mann's scientific misconduct investigation, and Steve McIntyre's enduring criticism of the hockey stick graph is highlighted. Don't miss this explosive testimony!
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Curry Denies Sexual-Rumor Allegation
- Curry rejected Mann's sexual-rumor email as a fabrication that mischaracterized her as a graduate student.
- She explained the implication was intended to discredit her achievements and give permission to ignore her.
Grant Tightness And Mann's Polarized Reputation
- Curry said grant competition tightened after 2012 and funding declines affected nearly all researchers, complicating claims of unique losses.
- She also noted Mann's public profile rose as a communicator while his collegial reputation became polarizing.
Cross-Examination Failed To Undermine Curry
- Cross-examination attempts to diminish Curry repeatedly failed due to objections and limits, preserving her credibility.
- The jury reacted sympathetically to her testimony about reputational harm and sexual-smear emails.