Contrafreeloading

In dieser Folge gehe ich der Frage nach: Sollte der Hund sich sein Futter erarbeiten müssen? Also: Ist Contrafreeloading für Hunde sinnvoll oder nicht?

Dabei schaue ich mir an, was Contrafreeloading überhaupt ist, woher es stammt und was die Wissenschaft zu diesem Thema zu sagen hat. Ferner spreche ich darüber, was du meines Erachtens bei Contrafreeloading mit deinem Hund beachten solltest.

QUELLEN

Baenninger & Mattleman: “Visual reinforcement: Operant acquisition in the presence of a free mirror”, 1973

Barnard & Hurst: “Welfare by design: the natural selection of welfare criteria”, 1996

Bekoff & Pierce: “Unleashing your dog: A field guide to giving your canine companion the best life possible”, 2019

Cloutier & Packard: “Enrichment options for African painted dogs (Lycaon pictus)”, 2014

D’Amato: “Derived motives”, 1974

da Silva Vaconcellos, Adania & Ades: “Contrafreeloading in maned wolves: Implications for their management and welfare”, 2012

Delgado, Han & Bain: “Domestic cats (Felis catus) prefer freely available food over food that requires effort”, 2021

Douxfils et al: “Domestication and responses to stress”, 2015

Dugatkin: “The silver fox domestication experiment”, 2018

Duncan & Hughes: “Free and operant feeding in domestic fowls”, 1972

Forthman & Ogden: “The role of applied behavior analysis in zoo management: Today and tomorrow”, 1992

Goldblatt: “Behavioural needs of captive marine mammals”, 1993

Inglis & Ferguson: “Starlings search for food rather than eat freely-available, identical food”, 1986

Jensen: “Preference for bar pressing over "freeloading" as a function of number of rewarded presses”, 1963

Knutson & Carlson: “Operant responding with free access to the reinforcer: A replication and extension”, 1973

Koffer & Coulson: “Feline indolence: Cats prefer free to response-produced food”, 1971

Langbein, Siebert & Nürnberg: “On the use of an automated learning device by group-housed dwarf goats: Do goats seek cognitive challenges?”, 2009

Lindqvist & Jensen: “Domestication and stress effects on contrafreeloading and spatial learning performance in red jungle fowls (Gallus gallus) and White Leghorn layers”, 2009

Lindqvist, Schütz & Jensen: “Red jungle fowl have more contrafreeloading than white leghorn layers: Effect of food deprivation and consequences for information gain”, 2002

Mason: “Animal boredom”, 1994

McGowan et al: “Contrafreeloading in grizzly bears: implications for captive foraging enrichment”, 2010

Menzel: “Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Problem seeking vs. the bind-in-hand, least-effort strategy”, 1991

Miller & Bender: “The breakfast effect: Dogs (Canis familiaris) serach more accurately when they are less hungry”, 2012

Morgan & Tromborg: “Sources of stress in captivity”, 2007

Neuringer: “Many responses per food reward with free food present” 1970

Osborne: “The free food (contrafreeloading) phenomenon: A review and analysis”, 1977

Pallaud: “Contribution à l’étude d’une situation de choix la Souri”, 1971

Powell: “Comparative studies of the preference for free vs. Response-produced reinforcers”, 1974

Rothkoff: “Contrafreeloading in the Domestic Dog (Canis lupus familiaris)”, 2023

Rothkoff, Feng & Byosiere: “Domestic pet dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) do not show a preference to contrafreeload, but are willing”, 2024

Sasson-Yenor & Powell: “Assessment of contrafreeloading preferences in giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis)”, 2019

Shepherdson, Mellen & Hutchins: “Second nature: Environmental enrichment for captive animals”, 1999

Smith et al: “Initial evidence for eliciting contrafreeloading in grey parrots (Psittacus Erithacus) via the opportunity for playful foraging”, 2021

Wemelsfelder: “Animal boredom: do animals miss being alert and active”, 1991

Young: “The importance of food presentation for animal welfare and conservation”, 1997

Young & Lawrence: “Do domestic pigs in controlled einvornments contrafreeload?”, 2003

DAS TREUHUNDBÜRO

Alles für ein harmonisches Leben mit deinem Hund.

www.treuhund.ch