The Delingpod: The James Delingpole Podcast Sasha Latypova
13 snips
Jan 13, 2026 Sasha Latypova, an independent writer and researcher with a background in pharma, sheds light on controversial topics in public health. She discusses her departure from the industry, the suppression of dissenting voices in media, and aims to testify in a significant Dutch court case about COVID measures. The conversation delves into the risks of mRNA products, the legal distinctions of emergency 'countermeasures', and historical vaccine skepticism. Sasha encourages critical thinking and questions authority, urging listeners to consider the truth behind health narratives.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Plaintiffs' Cases Were Merged After A Death
- Latypova describes two related Dutch cases: an earlier seven-plaintiff suit and a newer three-plaintiff one.
- One original plaintiff already died and lawyers are seeking to merge the cases for consolidated proceedings.
They Call The Jabs 'Countermeasures'
- Latypova and Catherine Watt argue COVID jabs are legally 'countermeasures', not vaccines or medical products.
- That classification places them under emergency programs with different rules and liability shields.
Legal And Practical Parallels To Weapons
- Latypova states the injections are functionally indistinguishable from weapons due to unknown, variable composition and harms.
- She compares them to a handgun: labeled however you like, the legal system treats them as potential weapons.
