
The Mikhaila Peterson Podcast Best Historical Argument for the Resurrection and Why Scholars Can't Dismiss It | Wesley Huff Ep 232
7 snips
May 7, 2026 Wesley Huff, New Testament historian who studies ancient manuscripts and scribal culture. He discusses how modern Bibles are closer to the originals than ever. He explains the best historical case for the resurrection, why early Christians rejected Gnostic writings, debates speaking in tongues, and traces how manuscript finds changed translations like KJV vs modern versions.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Why Modern Translations Are More Accurate
- Modern Bible translations are closer to the original wording because far more early manuscripts have been discovered since the King James era.
- Wesley Huff notes the King James relied on ~31 late manuscripts, whereas today we have over 5,000 Greek manuscripts and early papyri found after the 17th century.
Choose Modern Translations For Clearer Meaning
- Prefer modern translations like ESV, NIV, or NLT for clarity because some King James words are archaic or have shifted meaning.
- Huff gives the example 'halt' meaning 'lame' in KJV versus 'go back and forth' in modern versions to show how meaning changed.
Perseverance Shows True Salvation
- Genuine believers cannot lose salvation because Scripture emphasizes God's preserving work and assurances like 'no one can snatch them from my Father's hand.'
- Huff allows for apparent conversions that later fall away, but argues true spiritual regeneration perseveres.


