
Tech Policy Podcast 435: Live: The Perennial Urge to Censor New Technology
May 13, 2026
Christopher Ferguson, psychology professor who studies media panics and empirical harms research, and Nico Perrino, FIRE EVP and free-speech legal historian. They map centuries of moral panic around new media. They compare comic-book scares to social media and AI, debate age-based limits and liability for AI, and warn how moderation, algorithms, and rushed laws can quietly reshape speech.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Old Broadcast Rules Warn Against Rigid AI Controls
- Historic broadcast-era laws hardened into censorship tools before modern First Amendment protections matured.
- Corbin argues AI is a new knowledge-creation tool that must receive First Amendment protection to avoid repeat harms.
Avoid Equating Time Spent With Harm
- Don't assume screen time correlates with youth mental health harm; meta-analyses find near-zero effects for time spent.
- Christopher J. Ferguson notes research splits between small positive, small negative, and null results on social media effects.
Why Panics Persist Despite Weak Evidence
- Moral panic persists because older generations intuitively blame unfamiliar youth culture and media, amplified by a media ecosystem that rewards negative findings.
- Ferguson links publication bias and attention incentives to sustained alarm despite mixed evidence.








