The Daily Special Edition: A Guide to the Mueller Hearings
Jul 23, 2019
In this discussion, Michael Schmidt, a New York Times reporter known for his deep coverage of the Mueller investigation, breaks down the highly anticipated congressional testimony of Robert S. Mueller III. He dives into the strategic delays that shaped public perception, examines how questioning tactics could influence the narrative, and discusses the critical role of journalism in unveiling the truth. Schmidt also explores the expected Republican strategies and the potential ramifications for the 2020 election, emphasizing the complexities surrounding Mueller's findings.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Delayed Subpoena
- Democrats delayed subpoenaing Mueller due to concerns about optics and his reluctance.
- Mueller's initial unwillingness further complicated their decision to compel his testimony.
Democratic Hopes
- A dream scenario for Democrats is Mueller stating Trump would be indicted if not president.
- Realistically, they want Mueller to make the report's content resonate more with the public.
The McGahn Incident
- Michael Schmidt, as an "obstructionist" journalist, believes the McGahn incident is important.
- This is because it shows Trump potentially tampering with a witness.