The Cross of Christ vs the Golden Plates Evidence Review

In this text, Joshua Gehly employs a minimal facts approach to argue that the golden plates obtained by Joseph Smith are as historically verifiable as the cross of Jesus Christ. He notes that while no physical remnants of the cross exist, scholars accept the crucifixion as fact due to early, independent, and unsympathetic source manuscripts. By applying these same rigorous standards, Gehly asserts that the consistent eyewitness testimonies regarding the plates’ weight, appearance, and discovery in a stone box constitute a foundational historical reality. The author concludes that the most plausible explanation for the available data is that Smith possessed a genuine ancient artifact. Ultimately, the text posits that the restoration of the gospel can be defended using the same academic methodologies typically reserved for New Testament research.

Support the show