Truth Unites The Best Case for Jesus' Resurrection with Mike Licona
May 25, 2023
Mike Licona, New Testament scholar who studies the resurrection of Jesus, walks through why rigorous historiography supports the resurrection hypothesis. He recounts his own doubts turned into research, weighs alternative explanations like hallucination or body theft, and explains which historical facts are widely accepted. The conversation closes with practical steps for seekers to investigate the evidence further.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Method Trumps Presupposition
- Many biblical scholars lack formal training in historical method, which affects their assessments.
- Licona argues that professional historians' methods should inform resurrection studies to avoid worldview-driven conclusions.
Three Bedrock Historical Facts
- Licona identifies three historical bedrock facts nearly all scholars accept: crucifixion, followers' appearances, and Paul's conversion.
- These facts form the controlled evidence base for evaluating resurrection hypotheses.
Empty Tomb Is Secondary Consensus
- The empty tomb is widely discussed but sits behind the three bedrock facts in consensus.
- Licona places it as a second-order fact because non-Christian scholars are less unanimous about it.
