The Intelligence from The Economist “You’re…fired?” A momentous Supreme Court case
20 snips
Dec 9, 2025 
Join Stephen Mazey, a Supreme Court correspondent, and Tim Cross, a senior science writer, as they dive into pivotal issues surrounding presidential power and astronomy. Mazey discusses the far-reaching implications of a Supreme Court case on presidential removal authority, while Cross sheds light on how satellite constellations are sabotaging astronomical observations, leading to innovative challenges in current technology. They also explore the surprising resurgence of the pen industry amidst declining trends. It's a fascinating blend of law, science, and market dynamics!
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Court Signposts Point Toward Overruling
- The Supreme Court's conservative majority has repeatedly allowed emergency removals across multiple agencies this year.
- Those earlier rulings indicate the court may be prepared to erode Humphrey's Executor protections for multi-member agencies.
Clash Over Accountability Vs Independence
- Conservative justices argued independent agencies exercising executive power must be answerable to the president.
- Liberal justices warned that eliminating protections would destroy government structure and congressional choices about agency independence.
Wider Ripples If Protections Fall
- Overruling Humphrey's Executor could place about two dozen multi-member agencies under direct presidential control.
- The logic could spread further, threatening bodies like the Federal Reserve and legislative courts.