Red Scare

Smothering Heights

Feb 28, 2026
They savage Emerald Fennell's Wuthering Heights adaptation, focusing on ugly aesthetics, bizarre soundtrack choices, and gratuitous body-horror imagery. They critique miscasting, lack of chemistry, and removal of the novel's generational stakes. They debate ethnicity choices, feminist symbolism, and why some modern audiences still respond to the film.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Movie Was Visually And Tonally Repulsive

  • Anna and Dasha found Emerald Fennell's Wuthering Heights completely unredeemable, describing it as ugly, anti-sexual, and culturally alarming.
  • They compare it unfavorably to recent prestige films and call its aesthetic cheap, with latex costumes and clumsy set design.
INSIGHT

Removing Youth And Lineage Undermines The Story

  • Both hosts argue the film misses what makes Brontë's characters compelling: youthful folly and generational consequence.
  • They note Fennell aged characters up and removed heirs, stripping the novel's temporal stakes and emotional resonance.
INSIGHT

Explicit Body Horror Replaces Erotic Longing

  • The hosts say the film trades subtle erotic longing for explicit, unsexy body-horror and kink tropes that feel gratuitous.
  • They argue this choice produces revulsion rather than eroticism, likening it to lowbrow social-media aesthetics.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app