Wisløffs Dogmehistorie 28 Tridentinerkonsilet
8 snips
Aug 27, 2021 A deep dive into how the Council of Trent balanced Scripture and tradition, including the partim, partim debate. Discussion of the council's decisions on the biblical canon and the Vulgate. A tour through differing accounts of original sin and Marian sinlessness. A look at competing views of justification, from forensic imputation to inherent righteousness, and how Trento navigated theological compromises.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Trent Defines Scripture And Tradition Together
- The Council of Trent framed sources of divine knowledge as both Scripture and Tradition, not Scripture alone.
- Wisløff cites the term partim partim and shows Tridentine acts repeatedly present tradition alongside Scripture as authoritative evidence.
Tradition Proves Sacraments Trent Couldn’t Derive From Scripture
- Trent relies on apostolic tradition and unanimous fathers to establish certain sacraments beyond explicit Scripture texts.
- Wisløff points to ordination and marriage declared sacramental because 'apostolic tradition and fathers' testimony' make it perspicuous.
Trent Upholds Vulgate And Deuterocanonical Books
- Trent affirmed the Vulgate and accepted certain Deuterocanonical books as part of the canon.
- Wisløff notes the council treated Vulgate readings as authoritative for dogmatic proof while still allowing study of Hebrew/Greek texts.