Stand to Reason Weekly Podcast A Three-Point Response to the Problem of Evil
9 snips
Feb 25, 2026 A three-point reply to the problem of evil is presented, including why the deductive objection fails and why temporary evil might be permitted. A tricky question to ask someone who thinks anything touched by humans is tainted is discussed. The usefulness of Acts 17:26–27 for Molinism and debates about election and divine choice are explored.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Why The Deductive Problem Of Evil Fails
- The classic deductive problem of evil fails because it assumes without exception that a perfectly good God would eliminate all evil.
- Koukl shows that if it's possible God has morally sufficient reasons to allow temporary evil (e.g., to produce greater goods), the logical contradiction dissolves.
Use Plausible Theodicies To Weaken The Objection
- Offer plausible theodicies rather than insisting on full answers; showing a single plausible morally sufficient reason for permitting evil defeats the deductive claim.
- Koukl gives the needle/shot example: temporary pain justified by long-term good (health).
Parenting Needle Example To Illustrate Theodicy
- Greg Koukl shares a personal parenting/dental needle example to illustrate how allowing temporary harm can be justified by greater good.
- He recounts his daughter's reaction to shots and explains parental justification for temporary pain.