Double Jeopardy - UK Law and Politics

Is the Right To Jury Trial Just History? And is the House of Lord’s Assisted Dying Filibuster an Attack on Democracy?

Nov 28, 2025
The discussion dives deep into the controversial proposal to abolish jury trials in serious fraud cases, questioning the evidential basis behind this move. Retired Judge Geoffrey Rivlin critiques these reforms, arguing they risk undermining public confidence in the justice system. The hosts explore whether complex financial cases justify removing juries and highlight significant public support for assisted dying legislation, contrasting it with the political maneuvering of the House of Lords, deemed by some as obstructive to democracy.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Leveson's Argument Hinges On Constitutional Claim

  • Sir Brian's recommendation rests on his view that there is no constitutional right to trial by jury.
  • Geoffrey Rivlin and the hosts treat that premise as controversial and central to the recommendation's legitimacy.
INSIGHT

Few Long Fraud Trials At Southwark

  • Rivlin's data from Southwark shows very few lengthy fraud trials between 2019–2024, with only handfuls over three months.
  • He argues abolishing juries in fraud would not significantly reduce the wider Crown Court backlog.
INSIGHT

Prosecutions Must Be Intelligible To Public

  • Rivlin and Lady Justice Hallett argue true criminal charges should be intelligible to ordinary people.
  • If a prosecution cannot explain alleged dishonesty simply, its justification for imprisonment is doubtful.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app