Join Alison Young, a Professor of Public Law and UK constitutional expert, as she navigates the current challenges facing the UK constitution. She delves into the complexities of parliamentary sovereignty and the delicate balance with devolved powers. Young discusses the impacts of Brexit and notable cases like Gina Miller on constitutional dynamics. The conversation raises critical questions about the future of legislative authority and the potential need for a formal constitutional convention, suggesting reforms in a rapidly changing political landscape.
28:25
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
Parliamentary Sovereignty Defined
Parliamentary sovereignty places legislation at the top of the UK legal order and prevents one parliament from binding future parliaments.
This uncodified system means the UK lacks an entrenched written constitution above ordinary legislation.
insights INSIGHT
Devolution Is Delegation, Not Entrenchment
Westminster can legally override devolved parliaments because devolution is a delegation of powers, not a legal limit on Parliament.
The Sewel Convention is political, not legally enforceable, creating the oddity of permanent institutions with non-permanent powers.
insights INSIGHT
Supreme Court Resolves Devolution Clashes
Clashes over referendums and constitutional change often end up at the Supreme Court to determine whether devolved bodies have competence.
The Court resolves disputes by interpreting whether an act is reserved to Westminster or within devolved powers.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
We talk to lawyer and constitutional expert Alison Young about the current pressures on the UK constitution, from Brexit to devolution to political polarisation. Is parliamentary sovereignty still the linchpin of the system? What changed with the arrival of the Supreme Court? Can the constitution survive in its current form?
Talking Points:
How should we think about parliamentary sovereignty in the UK constitutional order?
The idea is that legislation enacted by parliament is the highest form of law in the land.
Unlike most other systems, the UK does not have a written constitution that is above legislation.
What does this mean for the Union?
In a nutshell, Westminster can still override other parliaments.
The civil convention is the idea that Westminster won’t legislate in the devolved areas or change the devolved structures without the consent of the devolved bodies.
But this can’t be legally enforced, and Westminster doesn’t always comply with it.
The UK doesn’t have a federal system: there aren’t the same legal limits on Westminster but there are legal limits on the devolved bodies.
In short, the institutions are permanent but their powers aren’t.
Did Parliament limit its sovereign powers when it created the Supreme Court?
Parliament could still abolish the court, but that could also trigger a constitutional crisis.
It’s not necessarily the Supreme Court that has limited parliamentary sovereignty.
EU law has primacy and direct effect. This is a restriction on parliamentary sovereignty.
Another tension is how the courts are beginning to interpret legislation.
Brexit has led to renewed focus on parliamentary sovereignty. On the one hand, we see the reassertion of parliamentary sovereignty against the executive. On the other hand, the Brexiteers see themselves as this very principle from the EU.
The Gina Miller case revolved around the tension between the government and parliament—whether the government could trigger Article 50. This case actually reinforced parliamentary sovereignty.
The referendum created a tension between the sovereignty of the people and the sovereignty of parliament.
TALKING POLITICS