Today, Explained Unraveling Roe
Dec 2, 2021
Ian Millhiser, Vox's Supreme Court correspondent, sheds light on the high-stakes implications of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health. He discusses how this case threatens to undermine Roe v. Wade without a direct overturn. The conversation touches on Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban, the influence of recent conservative appointments, and the critical principle of stare decisis. Millhiser delves into the potential shifts in abortion rights and the broader repercussions for judicial integrity, especially in light of laws like Texas's SB 8.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Roe v. Wade in Danger
- The Supreme Court's decision to hear the Mississippi case signals a threat to Roe v. Wade.
- The court's increasingly conservative stance, along with the Texas law, further jeopardizes abortion rights.
Possible Outcomes of Dobbs v. Jackson
- The Supreme Court could overrule Roe v. Wade entirely, allowing states to ban abortions outright.
- Alternatively, they could issue a dishonest opinion, upholding viability while giving states power to define it.
Impact on Abortion Rights
- If Roe v. Wade is overturned, states can create their own abortion laws, some with severe consequences for women.
- An incremental approach by the court would still set a national precedent, impacting abortion access in every state.