"Econ 102" with Noah Smith and Erik Torenberg

Immigration Debate w/ Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry and Noah Smith

86 snips
Dec 5, 2025
Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry, a noted writer and commentator on public policy, joins Noah Smith for a spirited debate on immigration. They delve into the moral and philosophical justifications of national borders, exploring the misconceptions held by voters about immigration's impact. Digging into enforcement strategies, Pascal questions progressive rhetoric while Noah suggests employer audits over mass deportations. The duo also discusses the intricate relationship between deportations, crime rates, and the fiscal toll on cities, leaving listeners with thought-provoking insights on a complex issue.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
ANECDOTE

Parsley Massacre Cited As Extreme Example

  • Noah recounts the Dominican Republic's 1937 'parsley massacre' as an extreme historical response to immigration.
  • He uses it to illustrate how enforcement can become brutal, though he says the U.S. won't follow that path.
ANECDOTE

Lawn Signs Reveal Elite Rhetoric Gap

  • Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry describes seeing 'No human is illegal' signs in affluent blue neighborhoods.
  • He highlights the cognitive dissonance of well-off educated people publicly endorsing absolutist slogans.
ADVICE

Deter Illegal Immigration By Targeting Employers

  • Reduce illegal immigration by cutting pull factors like employment access instead of harsh interior enforcement.
  • Noah Smith recommends employer audits, fines, and E-Verify-style measures to deter hiring undocumented workers.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app