
The Free Will Show Episode 74: Omissions and Moral Luck with Joseph Metz
Feb 26, 2024
Joseph Metz, a philosopher at Widener University, delves into intriguing concepts of moral luck and omissions. He defines omissions and argues their unique role in assessing moral responsibility. Metz highlights the asymmetry between actions and omissions, illustrating how context and abilities influence culpability. He also showcases cases where identical omissions yield different moral judgments based on luck. With a call for humility and a more uniform treatment of moral luck, Metz offers a thought-provoking exploration of our moral intuitions.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Omissions Reveal A Negative Side Of Agency
- Omissions are agent failures to act and reveal a negative dimension of agency often overlooked.
- Being morally responsible for an omission requires having the relevant ability to perform the omitted act.
Asymmetry Between Actions And Omissions
- Responsibility for actions doesn't require the ability to do otherwise, but omissions do.
- For omissions to ground blame, the agent must have been able to perform the omitted act.
Sharks Case Shows 'If You Can't, You Can't Blame'
- Fisher's sharks case illustrates inability negating blame: a bystander can't save a child because sharks would eat him.
- Removing the sharks restores ability and with it blameworthiness.
