
To The Contrary with Charlie Sykes “The Military Has Been a Little Bit Confused”
Mar 31, 2026
Mark Hertling, retired U.S. Army lieutenant general and former commander in Europe, and author of If I Don’t Return. He explains why unclear political goals make military planning for Iran so difficult. He lays out the limits of strike counts, the complexities of seizing islands and controlling the Strait of Hormuz, and why asymmetric tactics and willpower shape outcomes.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Military Confusion Without A Political End State
- The U.S. military lacks a clear political end state for operations against Iran, making coherent campaign planning difficult.
- Mark Hertling cites mixed options, shifting deployments, and unclear objectives despite thousands of strikes and new troop movements.
Advisors And Presentation Shape Presidential Perception
- Intelligence quality appears high but information presented to the president can be oversimplified or slanted by advisors.
- Hertling warns cultural bias and sycophancy may cause leaders to believe what they want rather than full intelligence nuance.
Strike Counts Aren't A Strategy
- High strike counts don't equal strategic success; campaign art must link operations to political objectives.
- Hertling echoes Mattis: thousands of strikes aren't a strategy without an end state and coherent campaign design.








