3 Things Inside the verdict that acquitted all Malegaon blast accused
Aug 5, 2025
Sadaf Modak, a journalist from The Indian Express, and legal affairs editor Apurva Vishwanath delve into the recent acquittal of all accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case. They dissect the court's ruling, emphasizing the prosecution's failure to provide compelling evidence. The discussion reveals troubling lapses in the investigation by agencies like the ATS and NIA. They also address the broader implications of this case on terrorism trials in India and the critical intersection of politics and law that hinders justice.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
NIA Challenges ATS Evidence
- The NIA dropped MCOCA citing improper invocation and rendered confessions inadmissible.
- NIA also questioned Thakur's involvement, stating no evidence linked her to the blast or conspiracy meetings.
Trial Hindered by Hostile & Lost Witnesses
- During trial, 39 witnesses turned hostile, claiming coercion and threat by ATS.
- Over 30 witnesses died before deposition due to trial duration, weakening the prosecution's case.
Forensic & Digital Evidence Rejected
- Court found no proof bomb was fitted inside the motorcycle, considering forensic evidence guesswork.
- Improper procedure in securing laptop evidence led the court to discard alleged audio-video recordings.