Comparisons are being drawn between New Zealand’s approach to Covid, and Sweden’s.
The findings of the second phase of the Covid Inquiry were released yesterday, and the response was found to be broadly effective, but slow to adapt and poorly communicated.
It also found some mandates to be overly restrictive, and the Auckland lockdown went on too long.
In Sweden, they had a less restrictive approach, focused on keeping life moving as normal as much as possible.
Cato Institute Senior Fellow Johan Norberg told Kerre Woodham that the population voluntarily engaged in social distancing and reducing travel, and so they only felt the need to briefly enforce limitations when a new wave hit in 2020.
He says the focus was on normalcy, as they didn’t know what would happen next, but they knew it would be a bad idea to hurt themselves further by shutting down schools and the economy.
LISTEN ABOVE
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Kerre Woodham Mornings Podcast