Rashid Khalidi on the Palestinian Cause in a Volatile Middle East, and the Meaning of Settler Colonialism

64 snips

Dec 13, 2024

Guest

Adam Kirsch

Guest

Rashid Khalidi

Rashid Khalidi, a professor emeritus at Columbia University and author of "The Hundred Years' War on Palestine," discusses the evolving Palestinian cause amid shifting Middle East dynamics. He critiques the limited support for Palestine from nations like Iran, emphasizing their self-interest. Khalidi also delves into the concept of settler colonialism, asserting it’s an accurate historical description of Israel’s actions, rather than an antisemitic slur. He highlights the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the need for justice and equality to achieve lasting peace.

Ask episode

AI Snips

Chapters

Books

Transcript

Episode notes

INSIGHT

Obligation and Avoidance

Hezbollah and Iran felt obligated to respond due to their commitment to Palestine.
Both actors, however, primarily aimed to avoid a major war with Israel.

INSIGHT

Settler Movement's Goals

Israeli settlers openly discuss annexing the West Bank and resettling Gaza.
This normalization of these ideas, even without Netanyahu's explicit support, is concerning.

INSIGHT

Fragmented Palestinian Movement

Khalidi believes the Palestinian movement is fragmented and lacks a viable strategy.
Both major Palestinian factions are discredited, worsening the situation.

Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode

Get the app

Power dynamics in the Middle East shifted dramatically this year. In Lebanon, Israel dealt a severe blow toHezbollah, and another crucial ally of Iran—Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria—was toppled by insurgents. But the historian Rashid Khalidi is skeptical that these changes will set back the Palestinian cause, as it relates to Israel. “This idea that the Palestinians are bereft of allies assumes that they had people who were doing things for their interest,” Khalidi tells David Remnick, “which I don’t think was true.” The limited responses to the war in Gaza by Iran and Hezbollah, Khalidi believes, clearly demonstrate that Iran’s so-called Axis of Resistance “was designed by Iran to protect the Iranian regime. . . . It wasn’t designed to protect Palestine.” Khalidi, a professor emeritus at Columbia University, is the author of a number of books on Palestinian history; among them, “The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine” has been particularly influential. The book helped bring the term “settler colonialism” into common parlance, at least on the left, to describe Israel’s relationship to historic Palestine. Sometimes invoked as a term of opprobrium, “settler colonialism” is strongly disputed by supporters of Israel. Khalidi asserts that the description is historically specific and accurate. The early Zionists, he says, understood their effort as colonization. “That’s not some antisemitic slur,” he says. “That’s the description they gave themselves.”
The concept of settler colonialism has been applied, on the political left, to describe Israel’s founding, and to its settlement of the Palestinian-occupied territories. This usage has been disputed by supporters of Israel and by thinkers including Adam Kirsch, an editor at the Wall Street Journal, who has also written about philosophy for The New Yorker. “Settler colonialism is . . . a zero-sum way of looking at the conflict,” Kirsch tells David Remnick. “In the classic examples, it involves the destruction of one people by another and their replacement over a large territory, really a continent-wide territory. That’s not at all the history of Israel and Palestine.” Kirsch made his case in a recent book, “On Settler Colonialism: Ideology, Violence, and Justice.”