
The Thomistic Institute The War That Never Was: Science vs. Faith – Prof. Lawrence M. Principe
18 snips
Mar 4, 2026 Prof. Lawrence M. Principe, Drew Professor at Johns Hopkins who studies alchemy, chemistry, and the science–religion dynamic, dismantles the myth of an inevitable conflict between science and faith. He traces the story to 19th century figures like Draper and White. Short takes explore myths like flat earth and God‑of‑the‑gaps, and why techno‑utopianism and bad theology kept the story alive.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Warfare Thesis Is A Modern Invention
- The popular warfare model of science versus religion is a very recent invention, not an eternal truth.
- Every serious historian of science today rejects the conflict thesis which arose mainly in the late 19th century by Draper and White.
Cornell Politics Sparked White's Warfare Narrative
- Andrew Dickson White created his warfare narrative largely as a political response while founding Cornell and fighting over Land Grant Act funds.
- White's personal vindictiveness and political motives drove him to reshape historical events to support his one-sided thesis.
Draper Mixed Metaphysics With Anti Catholic Rhetoric
- John William Draper's Conflict Between Religion and Science grew from a deterministic metaphysics and intense anti-Catholic sentiment.
- Draper promoted a universal law of development and caricatured Catholicism as incompatible with science, producing a best seller despite factual errors.











