Reception Perception: The Show RP Clips: Is Michael Pittman a Cut Candidate?
Mar 3, 2026
They debate whether a pricey veteran receiver will be cut given cap and dead-money concerns. They compare a steady possession target to a boom-or-bust deep threat and which profile fits Indy best. They outline roster replacement options, depth risks, and the value of multiple reliable receivers. They also weigh quarterback health and coaching plans that could shape receiver value.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Pittman Versus Pierce Valuation
- Michael Pittman is a likely cut/extension decision because he earns $29M this year with only $5M dead money and the Colts have limited cap space.
- Matt Harmon argues Pittman is more consistent and survivable across quarterbacks than Alec Pierce, making him more valuable in a vacuum.
Why Colts Might Keep Pierce Over Pittman
- The Colts might prefer keeping Alec Pierce because his skill set (vertical explosiveness and press-man beating) is less replaceable by internal options.
- Matt Harmon notes Pierce excelled on digs and press-beating routes, while Pittman can be replaced by Josh Downs/Tyler Warren reps.
Ballard's Hypothetical Comment On Pittman
- Chris Ballard publicly called hypotheticals about Pittman not being on the roster, signaling room for maneuvering.
- Matt Harmon recounts Pittman as a major culture guy who likes Indianapolis and could be extended instead of cut.