ThePrint ThePrintPod: Lawyer who fights for orphans’ rights enters SC fray for stray dogs. ‘Last line of defence’
Jan 16, 2026
Advocate Poulomi Pavini Shukla makes a compelling case in the Supreme Court about the vital link between homeless children and stray dogs. She argues that removing stray dogs would orphan children twice, as these animals often act as protectors. Shukla highlights the invisibility of both orphans and street dogs in society, questioning the prioritization of funds for dog shelters over orphanages. Her passionate plea called for securing children's safety before considering the fate of stray dogs. A thought-provoking discussion on compassion and social justice ensues.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Child And Dog At A Railway Station
- Poulomi Pavani Shukla asked the court to picture a 13-year-old girl sleeping at a railway station with a street dog beside her.
- She said that dog might be the child's only protector and removing it would orphan the child twice.
Parallels Between Orphans And Street Dogs
- Shukla drew a parallel between orphans and street dogs, saying both remain invisible and voiceless for years.
- She questioned public spending priorities, noting many districts lack orphanages while crores are discussed for dog shelters.
Case Reveals Who Remains Invisible
- The stray dog case exposed deeper questions about who we protect and who remains invisible in society.
- The court must balance public health concerns with protections for vulnerable humans and animals.