
The Daily The Lessons of 2016
Jan 31, 2020
In this discussion, Dean Baquet, the executive editor of The New York Times, offers an insightful analysis of the media's coverage of the 2016 presidential election. He reflects on the flawed assumptions that shaped narratives around Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump's candidacies. Baquet delves into the impact of Clinton's leaked emails and the ethical quandaries journalists faced. He also highlights how the 2016 election transformed journalism, urging a more nuanced approach in future coverage to better capture diverse voter sentiments.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Journalism's Imperfect Nature
- Baquet defends labeling Sanders a "long shot," stating that journalism must provide context for readers.
- He acknowledges the inherent flaws of journalism and the need to balance conveying information with avoiding preemptive judgments.
Trump's "Improbable Quest"
- Initial coverage of Trump's candidacy in 2015 dismissed him as an improbable contender.
- The Times, like many others, underestimated Trump's appeal and his potential to win the Republican nomination.
Extensive Trump Coverage
- While the media didn't initially believe Trump could win, they extensively covered him.
- This coverage included investigations into his real estate dealings, allegations of misogyny, and tax history.
