The Optispan Podcast with Matt Kaeberlein

THIS Helps Detect Heart Disease Before It Happens

Mar 9, 2026
Dr. Kim Brockenbrough, a board-certified cardiovascular radiologist and CEO of CardioVision with 25 years in vascular imaging, explains why a zero calcium score can be misleading. She discusses soft plaque danger, when coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is needed, ideal screening ages, follow-up timing, radiation and contrast tradeoffs, and how imaging can drive prevention and treatment choices.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
ANECDOTE

Runner With Zero Calcium Had 80% Blockage

  • A 48-year-old runner with a zero calcium score had an 80% LAD stenosis from soft plaque detected on CCTA.
  • Kim Brockenbrough used this case to show calcium=0 can miss dangerous non-calcified disease in younger, active patients.
INSIGHT

Soft Plaque Is More Dangerous Than Calcium

  • Soft (non-calcified) plaque is earlier-stage and more rupture-prone than calcified plaque, so calcium scores miss high-risk disease.
  • The SCOT-HEART 2020 data supports that soft plaque predicts events more than calcified plaque.
INSIGHT

Calcium Score Underestimates Early Disease

  • Coronary calcium scoring only shows calcified plaque and can give false reassurance; CCTA with contrast is the only noninvasive way to visualize soft plaque.
  • In CardioVision's first 100 patients of 2024, ~70% with calcium=0 had non-calcified plaque.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app