The MeidasTouch Podcast Trump Accidentally Waives his Immunity in Incriminating Posts
13 snips
Sep 22, 2025 The host dives into a fascinating analysis of Donald Trump's Truth Social posts and their legal ramifications. It highlights how his statements may have inadvertently waived his claim to absolute immunity. The discussion explores the distinction between official and unofficial speech, referencing past Supreme Court rulings. Furthermore, insights into the implications of Trump's ownership of the platform add depth to the conversation. This legal deep dive is both enlightening and provocative!
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Truth Social Posts Likely Unofficial
- Ben Meiselas argues Trump's Truth Social posts are likely unofficial because he created and owns the platform after leaving office.
- That ownership and timing make those posts fall outside the outer perimeter of presidential authority.
Trump's Truth Social Post Quoted Directly
- Ben Meiselas reads Trump's Truth Social post urging Pam Bondi to prosecute political opponents and demanding "Justice must be served now."
- He uses this exact post as a concrete example showing potentially incriminating unofficial conduct.
Preserve Public Posts For Future Review
- Meiselas urges documenting posts like this for future prosecutions or commissions after Trump leaves office.
- Preserve these public statements because they may undercut any claim of absolute immunity later.