What Next | Daily News and Analysis The Case for Fighting Dirty
16 snips
May 13, 2026 
Jamelle Bouie, New York Times opinion columnist who analyzes elections and voting rights, explores how courts and rulings have undercut redistricting wins. He discusses Virginia’s overturned map, limits on Section 2 enforcement, and bold Democratic responses. The conversation centers on aggressive strategies to counter entrenchment and restore competitive representation.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Supreme Court Shift Undermines Section 2 Remedies
- The Supreme Court has narrowed Section 2 protections by demanding proof of intentional discrimination rather than effect.
- Jamelle Bouie cites Alito's decisions in Alexander v. South Carolina and Calais as shifting precedent to permit partisan maps that disproportionately harm Black voters.
Lawmakers Openly Aim To Block Black Democratic Power
- Bouie recounts Alabama lawmakers openly saying they won't let specific Black Democratic leaders gain power.
- He cites a Mississippi lawmaker's remarks as evidence courts and legislatures are rushing to cement advantages.
Procedural Ruling Overturned Virginia Referendum
- Virginia's Supreme Court invalidated the voter-approved congressional map on a procedural posting rule tied to early voting.
- Bouie explains the majority treated early voting as 'the election,' creating legal paradoxes and undermining the referendum's legitimacy.