In Focus by The Hindu

India-US ‘trade deal’: What does India gain from it?

Feb 5, 2026
Prof. Arun Kumar, economist and former CESP, JNU professor, critiques the India‑US trade announcement. He argues the tariff changes are skewed against India. He questions the $500 billion import claim, flags risks to jobs and farmers from opening markets, and stresses the need for stronger domestic demand, wages, public investment and long‑term R&D strategy.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

One-Sided Tariff Shift

  • The announced India–US framework cuts US tariffs on some Indian goods from 50% to ~18%, but exposes Indian imports to zero tariffs and non-tariff barriers removal.
  • Arun Kumar calls it a one-sided, non-reciprocal arrangement that benefits US leverage more than Indian interests.
INSIGHT

Reciprocity Masking Protectionism

  • Arun Kumar compares current US bilateral pressure to historical multilateral dominance and calls it ‘‘king of the world’’ behavior.
  • He warns reciprocity rhetoric masks protectionism where the US sets unequal rules.
ANECDOTE

$500 Billion Was Misrepresented

  • Arun Kumar recalls the $500 billion figure originally meant as two-way trade by 2030, not a one-way import demand from India.
  • He emphasizes the original pledge's time frame and bilateral context were different from Trump's later statements.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app