Sportsday Sportsday with Sam Edmund, Gerard Healy & Ken Hinkley - Wednesday Full Show (11.03.26)
Mar 11, 2026
Panelists spar over whether Chris Judd or Nick Daicos had the stronger start to their careers. Heated debate on proposed illicit drugs policy changes and calls for tougher consequences. Deep dive into free agency mechanics and a radical draft tax idea. Tactical checklists for a first-time senior coach and a blunt 'eye test' review of Hawthorn's performance.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Set Up Lunch Swayed Gerard's Judd Vote
- Gerard Healy recounts being taken to a Carlton lunch where Chris Judd and club figures subtly influenced his vote on best first-five-years player.
- The setup led Healy to stick with Judd under pressure despite other experts favouring Nick Daicos.
Hair Testing Without Consequences Weakens Deterrence
- The AFL's proposed illicit drug policy swaps urine testing for season-long hair testing but keeps results largely medical and confidential.
- Ken Hinkley argues this removes meaningful deterrents because positives go to doctors and players face treatment not clear sanctions.
Attach Clear Consequences To Positive Tests
- Do attach clear, proportionate consequences to positive illicit drug tests to change player behaviour rather than solely relying on medical treatment.
- Ken recommends naming/identifying and suspension as mechanisms that create accountability and deterrence.