
The Vault: The Epstein Files Epstein Files Unsealed: Paul Cassell's Deposition In Cassell/Edwards V. Dershowitz (Part 3) (3/8/26)
Mar 9, 2026
Paul Cassell, a former federal judge and attorney for Epstein survivors, explains his sworn deposition in the Dershowitz defamation litigation. He discusses challenges to Epstein’s 2008 non-prosecution agreement, alleged inconsistencies in flight logs and documents, and why he publicly referenced survivor allegations. Short, direct accounts of evasive deposition tactics, contested exhibits, and the legal record drive the conversation.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Pattern Of Evasive And Contradicted Testimony
- Paul Cassell argues Dershowitz repeatedly gave misleading or false testimony during his deposition, indicating evasive behavior and contradictions over days of questioning.
- Cassell cites specific examples: evasive long answers, disputed statements about David Boies and Bob Josephberg, and a recording claim that changed between days.
Use The Record To Challenge Powerful Figures
- Cassell urges rigorous, record-based scrutiny of testimony and public statements to expose prosecutorial or defendant misconduct.
- He emphasizes relying on court filings, sworn victim testimony, investigative reporting, and contemporaneous evidence when advocating for survivors.
Newspaper Report Immediately Contradicted Dershowitz
- Cassell recounts a Florida business newspaper quickly reporting that David Boies denied Dershowitz's deposition claim about Boies' statements.
- That contemporaneous reporting corroborated Cassell's belief that Dershowitz made false statements under oath.
