The Environmental Protection Agency recently announced it was rescinding the 2009 endangerment finding, the legal foundation for federal regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. The administration has called the move the largest deregulatory action in U.S. history. What does it actually do? And what happens next?
On this episode of Stanford Legal, Professor Deborah Sivas, an expert in environmental law, joins co-host Pam Karlan to unpack the legal strategy behind the repeal, the role of recent Supreme Court decisions, and what’s likely to unfold in the courts. Among other ramifications, they also explore California’s authority to adopt its own, more aggressive emissions standards and what this latest move by the Trump administration signals for the future of federal climate regulation.
Links:
- Deborah Sivas >>> Stanford Law page
- Environmental Law Clinic >>> Stanford Law page
Connect:
- Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
- Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
- Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
- Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page
- Diego Zambrano >>> Stanford Law School Page
- Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
- Stanford Lawyer Magazine >>> Twitter/X
(00:00:00): The EPA’s rescission of the Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding
(00:06:43): Climate science consensus and legal strategy
(00:16:01): The litigation roadmap: process vs. substance
(00:29:53): Wind power on the cusp
(00:30:10): Solar economics and federal land authority
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.